The term “patterns” is often heard in Daniel Roher and Charlie Tyrell‘s The AI Doc, but not in a Rod Serling sense.
From Owen Gleiberman‘s 3.25 Variety review:
“The AI Doc wants to know, and it wants you to know. To know what? To know what in the actual fuck we’re dealing with, which is a technology that’s going to upend the world as we know it.
“It will wipe out jobs like a tsunami, it’s going to replace workers it is smarter than, and it’s going to be given more and more control — and take more and more control — because that’s the nature of how it works. It’s a synthetic mind, but it’s designed to evolve into an invincible operating system.
“Here’s what AI says: “I think, therefore I am. And therefore, I tell the human race what it should do.”
“The AI revolution has not been marketed as a sunnier version of what it’s going to be. If anything, all the prognostication about it is being led by dread. And The AI Doc shows you why. The film’s free-associative form and style says: Strap yourself in — it’s going to be a bumpy disturbing trip, and let’s hope we’re all still here when it’s over.
“And here’s the eerie part. It’s not like those days when we were ‘building better computers’ — no, the weirdness of AI is that it advances by itself. Machine / tech disruptions are always compared to the Industrial Revolution, because that was the original Great Leap Forward in modern human advancement. But when one of the wags in The AI Doc says, ‘It will make the Industrial Revolution look like small beans,” you feel, for perhaps the first time, that that’s no mere metaphor.”













